PairBook
HomeBCE › BCE vs VRT

BCE vs VRT: Correlation

BCE, Inc. (BCE) and Vertiv (VRT) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.22.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.22
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.04
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.10
long-run
Ann. covariance
-269.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BCE and VRT?

Over the past 3 years, BCE and VRT moved with a correlation of -0.22, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.04) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.22). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.10, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -269.2 %².

Among the 27 assets we track against BCE, VRT ranks #22 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months VRT outperformed by 109.9 percentage points (-1.4% for BCE against +108.5% for VRT). Risk is not evenly split, since VRT carries 2.7 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BCE vs VRT: side by side

BCE (BCE, Inc.)VRT (Vertiv)
1-year return-1.4%+108.5%
5-year return-36.8%+847.7%
Volatility (ann.)21.5%57.1%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.062.36
Max drawdown (3Y)-43.5%-61.3%
Market cap$21.8B$103.7B
P/E (trailing)4.859.6
Dividend yield7.45%0.07%
Sector / categoryUS ListedIndustrials
Lower P/E: BCE 4.8 vs 59.6Higher yield: BCE 7.45% vs 0.07%Smaller drawdown: BCE -43.5% vs -61.3%Higher 5y return: VRT +847.7% vs -36.8%
-9%0%+199%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. BCE · VRT

Year-by-year returns

YearBCEVRT
2022-10.6%-45.3%
2023-4.2%+251.8%
2024-35.5%+136.8%
2025+10.2%+42.8%
2026+0.8%+66.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BCE and VRT good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.22, BCE and VRT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BCE and VRT?

The BCE/VRT correlation stands at -0.22 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.04, 5 years: -0.10), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is VRT a good diversifier for BCE?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.22, BCE and VRT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?

A reading of -0.22 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bce-vs-vrt.json

BCE vs VRT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.22BCE vs VRT-0.22

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![BCE vs VRT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bce-vs-vrt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bce-vs-vrt/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BCE correlations · VRT correlations