PairBook
HomeBCE › BCE vs RJF

BCE vs RJF: Correlation

BCE, Inc. (BCE) and Raymond James Financial (RJF) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.17.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.17
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.32
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.04
long-run
Ann. covariance
-93.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BCE and RJF?

Over the past 3 years, BCE and RJF moved with a correlation of -0.17, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.32 versus -0.17 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.04, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -93.2 %².

Within BCE's tracked universe of 27 assets, RJF comes in at #14 by 3-year correlation. On 12-month performance RJF holds a 7.7-point edge, -1.4% against +6.3%.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BCE vs RJF: side by side

BCE (BCE, Inc.)RJF (Raymond James Financial)
1-year return-1.4%+6.3%
5-year return-36.8%+102.1%
Volatility (ann.)21.5%24.8%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.061.03
Max drawdown (3Y)-43.5%-28.1%
Market cap$21.8B$33.8B
P/E (trailing)4.815.4
Dividend yield7.45%1.20%
Sector / categoryUS ListedFinancials
Lower P/E: BCE 4.8 vs 15.4Higher yield: BCE 7.45% vs 1.20%Smaller drawdown: RJF -28.1% vs -43.5%Higher 5y return: RJF +102.1% vs -36.8%
-14%0%+11%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. BCE · RJF

Year-by-year returns

YearBCERJF
2022-10.6%+8.3%
2023-4.2%+6.1%
2024-35.5%+40.8%
2025+10.2%+4.7%
2026+0.8%+10.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BCE and RJF good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.17, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BCE and RJF?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BCE and RJF is -0.17 over 3 years, -0.32 over 1 year and 0.04 over 5 years.

Is RJF a good diversifier for BCE?

Yes: at -0.17, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.17 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bce-vs-rjf.json

BCE vs RJF: 3-year weekly correlation -0.17BCE vs RJF-0.17

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![BCE vs RJF correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bce-vs-rjf.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bce-vs-rjf/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BCE correlations · RJF correlations