PairBook
HomeBCAT › BCAT vs VT

BCAT vs VT: Correlation

BlackRock Capital Allocation Term Trust (BCAT) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) show a strong relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.68.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.68
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.69
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.73
long-run
Ann. covariance
123.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BCAT and VT?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BCAT and VT correlate at 0.68, strong. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.69 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.73, with an annualized covariance of 123.0 %².

By 3-year correlation, VT places #5 of the 11 assets tracked against BCAT. On 12-month performance BCAT holds a 9.5-point edge, +32.2% against +22.7%.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BCAT vs VT: side by side

BCAT (BlackRock Capital Allocation Term Trust)VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF)
1-year return+32.2%+22.7%
5-year return+49.6%+67.7%
Volatility (ann.)13.1%13.9%
Beta vs S&P 5000.600.92
Max drawdown (3Y)-13.7%-16.5%
Market cap$1.7B
P/E (trailing)7.5
Dividend yield0.00%1.59%
Expense ratio0.06%
Assets under management$97.9B
Sector / categoryUS ListedETF · Global
Higher yield: VT 1.59% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: BCAT -13.7% vs -16.5%Higher 5y return: VT +67.7% vs +49.6%

VT is a Global Large-Stock Blend fund from Vanguard: $97.9B under management, 5308 holdings, a 0.06% expense ratio, a 1.59% trailing dividend yield.

-2%0%+30%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). BCAT · VT

Year-by-year returns

YearBCATVT
2022-22.6%-18.0%
2023+19.3%+22.0%
2024+19.4%+16.5%
2025+16.8%+22.4%
2026+28.4%+15.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BCAT and VT good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.68 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BCAT and VT?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.68 over 3 years, with 0.69 over the last year and 0.73 over 5 years.

Is VT a good diversifier for BCAT?

To a limited degree. At 0.68 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.68 mean?

A reading of 0.68 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bcat-vs-vt.json

BCAT vs VT: 3-year weekly correlation 0.68BCAT vs VT0.68

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![BCAT vs VT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bcat-vs-vt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bcat-vs-vt/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BCAT correlations · VT correlations