PairBook
HomeBCAB › BCAB vs CHD

BCAB vs CHD: Correlation

How closely do BioAtla, Inc. (BCAB) and Church & Dwight (CHD) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.19, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.19
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.10
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.01
long-run
Ann. covariance
-405.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BCAB and CHD?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BCAB and CHD correlate at -0.19, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.10) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.01, with an annualized covariance of -405.4 %².

Out of 11 assets tracked against BCAB, CHD lands near the bottom at #8. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months CHD outperformed by 97.5 percentage points (-86.0% for BCAB against +11.5% for CHD). One caveat on sizing: BCAB is 6.8 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BCAB vs CHD: side by side

BCAB (BioAtla, Inc.)CHD (Church & Dwight)
1-year return-86.0%+11.5%
5-year return-99.8%+30.0%
Volatility (ann.)119.3%17.6%
Beta vs S&P 5002.750.07
Max drawdown (3Y)-98.4%-27.3%
Market cap$24.3B
P/E (trailing)33.0
Dividend yield0.00%1.17%
Sector / categoryUS ListedConsumer Staples
Higher yield: CHD 1.17% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: CHD -27.3% vs -98.4%Higher 5y return: CHD +30.0% vs -99.8%
-88%0%+68%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. BCAB · CHD

Year-by-year returns

YearBCABCHD
2022-58.0%-20.4%
2023-70.2%+18.7%
2024-76.0%+12.0%
2025-3.9%-18.9%
2026-88.9%+23.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BCAB and CHD good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.19, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BCAB and CHD?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BCAB and CHD is -0.19 over 3 years, -0.10 over 1 year and -0.01 over 5 years.

Is CHD a good diversifier for BCAB?

Yes: at -0.19, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?

A reading of -0.19 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bcab-vs-chd.json

BCAB vs CHD: 3-year weekly correlation -0.19BCAB vs CHD-0.19

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![BCAB vs CHD correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bcab-vs-chd.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bcab-vs-chd/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BCAB correlations · CHD correlations