BC vs WY: Correlation
How closely do Brunswick Corporation (BC) and Weyerhaeuser (WY) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.65, which is strong.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are BC and WY?
Over the past 3 years, BC and WY moved with a correlation of 0.65, which is strong. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.58) sits close to the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.66, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 579.6 %².
Among the 58 assets we track against BC, WY ranks #12 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with BC ahead by 27.8 points (+21.7% versus -6.1%).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
BC vs WY: side by side
| BC (Brunswick Corporation) | WY (Weyerhaeuser) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +21.7% | -6.1% |
| 5-year return | -15.3% | -19.5% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 35.8% | 24.8% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.22 | 0.64 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -56.5% | -38.0% |
| Market cap | $5.0B | $17.1B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 36.5 |
| Dividend yield | 2.18% | 3.49% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | Real Estate |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | BC | WY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -27.1% | -20.4% |
| 2023 | +36.9% | +18.0% |
| 2024 | -31.8% | -16.6% |
| 2025 | +18.1% | -13.0% |
| 2026 | +6.2% | +1.8% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are BC and WY good diversifiers for each other?
Only partially. A correlation of 0.65 means BC and WY share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.
FAQ
What is the correlation between BC and WY?
The BC/WY correlation stands at 0.65 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.58, 5 years: 0.66), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is WY a good diversifier for BC?
Only partially. A correlation of 0.65 means BC and WY share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.
What does a correlation of 0.65 mean?
A reading of 0.65 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bc-vs-wy.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bc-vs-wy/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: BC correlations · WY correlations
