BC vs WNC: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Brunswick Corporation (BC) and Wabash National Corporation (WNC) carry a correlation of 0.53, a moderate link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are BC and WNC?
Over the past 3 years, BC and WNC moved with a correlation of 0.53, which is moderate. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.55) sits close to the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.53, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 956.7 %².
Among the 58 assets we track against BC, WNC ranks #33 by 3-year correlation. Neither side won the trailing year by much: +21.7% against +19.0%.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
BC vs WNC: side by side
| BC (Brunswick Corporation) | WNC (Wabash National Corporation) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +21.7% | +19.0% |
| 5-year return | -15.3% | -6.2% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 35.8% | 49.9% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.22 | 0.70 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -56.5% | -76.4% |
| Market cap | $5.0B | $0.5B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 2.18% | 2.56% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | BC | WNC |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -27.1% | +18.2% |
| 2023 | +36.9% | +14.9% |
| 2024 | -31.8% | -32.2% |
| 2025 | +18.1% | -48.1% |
| 2026 | +6.2% | +56.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are BC and WNC good diversifiers for each other?
Only partially. A correlation of 0.53 means BC and WNC share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.
FAQ
What is the correlation between BC and WNC?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BC and WNC is 0.53 over 3 years, 0.55 over 1 year and 0.53 over 5 years.
Is WNC a good diversifier for BC?
Only partially. A correlation of 0.53 means BC and WNC share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.
What does a correlation of 0.53 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.53 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bc-vs-wnc.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bc-vs-wnc/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: BC correlations · WNC correlations
