BC vs NAUT: Correlation
Brunswick Corporation (BC) and Nautilus Biotechnology, Inc. (NAUT) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.41.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are BC and NAUT?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BC and NAUT correlate at 0.41, moderate. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.24) runs below the 3-year figure (0.41). Stretching to 5 years gives 0.34, with an annualized covariance of 1062.1 %².
NAUT is close to the least connected end of BC's tracked universe, ranking #54 of 58. On 12-month performance NAUT holds a 6.9-point edge, +21.7% against +28.6%. Risk is not evenly split, since NAUT carries 2.0 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
BC vs NAUT: side by side
| BC (Brunswick Corporation) | NAUT (Nautilus Biotechnology, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +21.7% | +28.6% |
| 5-year return | -15.3% | -88.5% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 35.8% | 72.5% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.22 | 1.36 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -56.5% | -83.8% |
| Market cap | $5.0B | $0.1B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 2.18% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | BC | NAUT |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -27.1% | -65.3% |
| 2023 | +36.9% | +66.1% |
| 2024 | -31.8% | -43.8% |
| 2025 | +18.1% | +16.1% |
| 2026 | +6.2% | -53.6% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are BC and NAUT good diversifiers for each other?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.41 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between BC and NAUT?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BC and NAUT is 0.41 over 3 years, 0.24 over 1 year and 0.34 over 5 years.
Is NAUT a good diversifier for BC?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.41 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.41 mean?
A reading of 0.41 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bc-vs-naut.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bc-vs-naut/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: BC correlations · NAUT correlations
