BC vs KRUS: Correlation
Brunswick Corporation (BC) and Kura Sushi USA, Inc. (KRUS) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.47.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are BC and KRUS?
On 3 years of weekly data the BC/KRUS correlation comes out at 0.47, moderate. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.61) runs above the 3-year figure (0.47). The 5-year figure is 0.41, and annualized covariance runs at 1159.0 %².
Within BC's tracked universe of 58 assets, KRUS comes in at #46 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months BC outperformed by 64.6 percentage points (+21.7% for BC against -42.9% for KRUS). One caveat on sizing: KRUS is 1.9 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
BC vs KRUS: side by side
| BC (Brunswick Corporation) | KRUS (Kura Sushi USA, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +21.7% | -42.9% |
| 5-year return | -15.3% | -8.8% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 35.8% | 69.0% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.22 | 1.57 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -56.5% | -65.4% |
| Market cap | $5.0B | $0.6B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 2.18% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | BC | KRUS |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -27.1% | -41.0% |
| 2023 | +36.9% | +59.4% |
| 2024 | -31.8% | +19.2% |
| 2025 | +18.1% | -42.2% |
| 2026 | +6.2% | -11.6% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are BC and KRUS good diversifiers for each other?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.47 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between BC and KRUS?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BC and KRUS is 0.47 over 3 years, 0.61 over 1 year and 0.41 over 5 years.
Is KRUS a good diversifier for BC?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.47 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.47 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.47 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bc-vs-krus.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bc-vs-krus/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: BC correlations · KRUS correlations
