BC vs BLCO: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Brunswick Corporation (BC) and Bausch + Lomb Corporation (BLCO) carry a correlation of 0.43, a moderate link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are BC and BLCO?
On 3 years of weekly data the BC/BLCO correlation comes out at 0.43, moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.44 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.37, and annualized covariance runs at 606.4 %².
Within BC's tracked universe of 58 assets, BLCO comes in at #53 by 3-year correlation. Twelve-month performance is nearly a tie, at +21.7% for BC and +17.7% for BLCO.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
BC vs BLCO: side by side
| BC (Brunswick Corporation) | BLCO (Bausch + Lomb Corporation) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +21.7% | +17.7% |
| 5-year return | -15.3% | -14.4% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 35.8% | 39.6% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.22 | 0.82 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -56.5% | -47.9% |
| Market cap | $5.0B | $6.1B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 2.18% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | BC | BLCO |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -27.1% | – |
| 2023 | +36.9% | +10.0% |
| 2024 | -31.8% | +5.9% |
| 2025 | +18.1% | -5.4% |
| 2026 | +6.2% | +0.3% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are BC and BLCO good diversifiers for each other?
Reasonably. At 0.43, BC and BLCO keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between BC and BLCO?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BC and BLCO is 0.43 over 3 years, 0.44 over 1 year and 0.37 over 5 years.
Is BLCO a good diversifier for BC?
Reasonably. At 0.43, BC and BLCO keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.43 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bc-vs-blco.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bc-vs-blco/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: BC correlations · BLCO correlations