PairBook
HomeBBGI › BBGI vs RCI

BBGI vs RCI: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc. (BBGI) and Rogers Communication, Inc. (RCI) carry a correlation of -0.18, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.18
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.27
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.14
long-run
Ann. covariance
-814.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BBGI and RCI?

On 3 years of weekly data the BBGI/RCI correlation comes out at -0.18, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.27 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.14, and annualized covariance runs at -814.9 %².

Within BBGI's tracked universe of 22 assets, RCI comes in at #14 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with BBGI ahead by 324.0 points (+328.8% versus +4.8%). One caveat on sizing: BBGI is 7.2 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BBGI vs RCI: side by side

BBGI (Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc.)RCI (Rogers Communication, Inc.)
1-year return+328.8%+4.8%
5-year return-61.6%-14.6%
Volatility (ann.)178.9%24.8%
Beta vs S&P 5001.940.25
Max drawdown (3Y)-85.2%-48.2%
Market cap$19.7B
P/E (trailing)4.5
Dividend yield0.00%5.42%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: RCI 5.42% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: RCI -48.2% vs -85.2%Higher 5y return: RCI -14.6% vs -61.6%
-32%0%+464%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). BBGI · RCI

Year-by-year returns

YearBBGIRCI
2022-51.6%+1.6%
2023-4.3%+3.4%
2024-46.5%-31.9%
2025-46.8%+27.3%
2026+293.8%-1.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BBGI and RCI good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.18, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BBGI and RCI?

The BBGI/RCI correlation stands at -0.18 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.27, 5 years: -0.14), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is RCI a good diversifier for BBGI?

Yes: at -0.18, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.18 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.18 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bbgi-vs-rci.json

BBGI vs RCI: 3-year weekly correlation -0.18BBGI vs RCI-0.18

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![BBGI vs RCI correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bbgi-vs-rci.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bbgi-vs-rci/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BBGI correlations · RCI correlations