BBDC vs FNGD: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Barings BDC, Inc. (BBDC) and MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due (FNGD) carry a correlation of -0.29, a negative link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are BBDC and FNGD?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BBDC and FNGD correlate at -0.29, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.40) than the 3-year average (-0.29). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.32, with an annualized covariance of -427.5 %².
Among the 12 assets we track against BBDC, FNGD sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #10. The last year tells two different stories: BBDC led by 63.5 percentage points, +7.8% for BBDC against -55.7% for FNGD. Note the risk asymmetry: FNGD runs 3.9 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
BBDC vs FNGD: side by side
| BBDC (Barings BDC, Inc.) | FNGD (MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +7.8% | -55.7% |
| 5-year return | +50.4% | -99.4% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 19.5% | 75.7% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.60 | -4.54 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -24.5% | -97.6% |
| Market cap | $1.0B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 11.4 | 20.6 |
| Dividend yield | 11.12% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | BBDC | FNGD |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -18.6% | +52.2% |
| 2023 | +18.5% | -90.1% |
| 2024 | +23.9% | -76.6% |
| 2025 | +8.8% | -61.4% |
| 2026 | +8.6% | -49.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are BBDC and FNGD good diversifiers for each other?
Yes: at -0.29, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
FAQ
What is the correlation between BBDC and FNGD?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BBDC and FNGD is -0.29 over 3 years, -0.40 over 1 year and -0.32 over 5 years.
Is FNGD a good diversifier for BBDC?
Yes: at -0.29, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
What does a correlation of -0.29 mean?
A reading of -0.29 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bbdc-vs-fngd.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bbdc-vs-fngd/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: BBDC correlations · FNGD correlations
