PairBook
HomeBAX › BAX vs VTRS

BAX vs VTRS: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Baxter International (BAX) and Viatris (VTRS) carry a correlation of 0.44, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.44
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.45
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.39
long-run
Ann. covariance
558.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BAX and VTRS?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BAX and VTRS correlate at 0.44, moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.45 over 1 year against 0.44 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.39, with an annualized covariance of 558.1 %².

By 3-year correlation, VTRS places #25 of the 43 assets tracked against BAX. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with VTRS ahead by 61.2 points (+6.6% versus +67.8%). Across three years, the rolling one-year figure varied moderately, from 0.15 to 0.63.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
Rolling one-year correlation of weekly returns over the past three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BAX vs VTRS: side by side

BAX (Baxter International)VTRS (Viatris)
1-year return+6.6%+67.8%
5-year return-62.2%+44.6%
Volatility (ann.)38.4%32.8%
Beta vs S&P 5000.890.79
Max drawdown (3Y)-62.4%-45.0%
Market cap$13.4B$19.4B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.75%2.85%
Sector / categoryHealth CareHealth Care
Higher yield: VTRS 2.85% vs 0.75%Smaller drawdown: VTRS -45.0% vs -62.4%Higher 5y return: VTRS +44.6% vs -62.2%
-34%0%+72%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. BAX · VTRS

Year-by-year returns

YearBAXVTRS
2022-39.6%-14.3%
2023-21.9%+2.1%
2024-22.4%+19.7%
2025-33.3%+5.1%
2026+35.8%+38.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BAX and VTRS good diversifiers for each other?

Reasonably. At 0.44, BAX and VTRS keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BAX and VTRS?

The BAX/VTRS correlation stands at 0.44 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.45, 5 years: 0.39), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is VTRS a good diversifier for BAX?

Reasonably. At 0.44, BAX and VTRS keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.44 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bax-vs-vtrs.json

BAX vs VTRS: 3-year weekly correlation 0.44BAX vs VTRS0.44

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![BAX vs VTRS correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bax-vs-vtrs.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bax-vs-vtrs/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BAX correlations · VTRS correlations