PairBook
HomeBAX › BAX vs PUMP

BAX vs PUMP: Correlation

How closely do Baxter International (BAX) and ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.17, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.17
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.49
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.09
long-run
Ann. covariance
-428.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BAX and PUMP?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BAX and PUMP correlate at -0.17, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.49) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.17). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.09, with an annualized covariance of -428.4 %².

Within BAX's tracked universe of 43 assets, PUMP comes in at #35 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with PUMP ahead by 121.6 points (+6.6% versus +128.2%). One caveat on sizing: PUMP is 1.7 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BAX vs PUMP: side by side

BAX (Baxter International)PUMP (ProPetro Holding Corp.)
1-year return+6.6%+128.2%
5-year return-62.2%+45.4%
Volatility (ann.)38.4%65.1%
Beta vs S&P 5000.890.73
Max drawdown (3Y)-62.4%-59.1%
Market cap$13.4B$1.4B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.75%0.00%
Sector / categoryHealth CareUS Listed
Higher yield: BAX 0.75% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: PUMP -59.1% vs -62.4%Higher 5y return: PUMP +45.4% vs -62.2%
-34%0%+266%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). BAX · PUMP

Year-by-year returns

YearBAXPUMP
2022-39.6%+28.0%
2023-21.9%-19.2%
2024-22.4%+11.3%
2025-33.3%+1.9%
2026+35.8%+17.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BAX and PUMP good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.17, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BAX and PUMP?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BAX and PUMP is -0.17 over 3 years, -0.49 over 1 year and -0.09 over 5 years.

Is PUMP a good diversifier for BAX?

Yes: at -0.17, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.17 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.17 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bax-vs-pump.json

BAX vs PUMP: 3-year weekly correlation -0.17BAX vs PUMP-0.17

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![BAX vs PUMP correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bax-vs-pump.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bax-vs-pump/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BAX correlations · PUMP correlations