PairBook
HomeBAOS › BAOS vs DBGI

BAOS vs DBGI: Correlation

Baosheng Media Group Holdings Limited (BAOS) and Digital Brands Group, Inc. (DBGI) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.27.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.27
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.50
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.14
long-run
Ann. covariance
-34631.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BAOS and DBGI?

On 3 years of weekly data the BAOS/DBGI correlation comes out at -0.27, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.50) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.27). The 5-year figure is -0.14, and annualized covariance runs at -34631.4 %².

DBGI is close to the least connected end of BAOS's tracked universe, ranking #11 of 12. The last year tells two different stories: DBGI led by 55.3 percentage points, -84.5% for BAOS against -29.2% for DBGI. Note the risk asymmetry: DBGI runs 9.9 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BAOS vs DBGI: side by side

BAOS (Baosheng Media Group Holdings Limited)DBGI (Digital Brands Group, Inc.)
1-year return-84.5%-29.2%
5-year return-96.8%-100.0%
Volatility (ann.)113.6%1127.2%
Beta vs S&P 5002.15-1.93
Max drawdown (3Y)-94.0%-100.0%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: BAOS -94.0% vs -100.0%Higher 5y return: BAOS -96.8% vs -100.0%
-96%0%+101%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. BAOS · DBGI

Year-by-year returns

YearBAOSDBGI
2022-3.9%-98.2%
2023-30.0%-96.9%
2024-29.1%-98.9%
2025+6.6%+610.8%
2026-84.3%-43.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BAOS and DBGI good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.27, BAOS and DBGI have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BAOS and DBGI?

The BAOS/DBGI correlation stands at -0.27 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.50, 5 years: -0.14), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is DBGI a good diversifier for BAOS?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.27, BAOS and DBGI have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.27 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.27 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/baos-vs-dbgi.json

BAOS vs DBGI: 3-year weekly correlation -0.27BAOS vs DBGI-0.27

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![BAOS vs DBGI correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/baos-vs-dbgi.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/baos-vs-dbgi/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BAOS correlations · DBGI correlations