BAM vs VINP: Correlation
How closely do Brookfield Asset Management Inc Class A Limited Voting (BAM) and Vinci Compass Investments Ltd. - Class A (VINP) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.49, which is moderate.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are BAM and VINP?
On 3 years of weekly data the BAM/VINP correlation comes out at 0.49, moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.43 over 1 year against 0.49 over 3. The 5-year figure is 0.47, and annualized covariance runs at 340.5 %².
Among the 19 assets we track against BAM, VINP ranks #13 by 3-year correlation. Over the last 12 months VINP came out ahead by 12.2 percentage points (-10.6% against +1.6%).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
BAM vs VINP: side by side
| BAM (Brookfield Asset Management Inc Class A Limited Voting) | VINP (Vinci Compass Investments Ltd. - Class A) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -10.6% | +1.6% |
| 5-year return | n/a | -3.1% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 28.2% | 24.6% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.35 | 0.76 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -30.4% | -28.9% |
| Market cap | $83.2B | $0.6B |
| P/E (trailing) | 29.9 | 13.9 |
| Dividend yield | 3.61% | 37.52% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | BAM | VINP |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | – | -9.3% |
| 2023 | +45.6% | +30.5% |
| 2024 | +39.7% | -1.9% |
| 2025 | -0.2% | +37.4% |
| 2026 | +1.5% | -22.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are BAM and VINP good diversifiers for each other?
A fair diversifier. At 0.49, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
FAQ
What is the correlation between BAM and VINP?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.49 over 3 years, with 0.43 over the last year and 0.47 over 5 years.
Is VINP a good diversifier for BAM?
A fair diversifier. At 0.49, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
What does a correlation of 0.49 mean?
A reading of 0.49 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bam-vs-vinp.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bam-vs-vinp/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: BAM correlations · VINP correlations
