PairBook
HomeBAM › BAM vs QQQ

BAM vs QQQ: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Brookfield Asset Management Inc Class A Limited Voting (BAM) and Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ) carry a correlation of 0.62, a strong link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.62
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.55
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.59
long-run
Ann. covariance
340.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BAM and QQQ?

Over the past 3 years, BAM and QQQ moved with a correlation of 0.62, which is strong. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.55 over 1 year against 0.62 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.59, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 340.0 %².

By 3-year correlation, QQQ places #8 of the 19 assets tracked against BAM. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months QQQ outperformed by 36.9 percentage points (-10.6% for BAM against +26.3% for QQQ).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BAM vs QQQ: side by side

BAM (Brookfield Asset Management Inc Class A Limited Voting)QQQ (Invesco QQQ Trust)
1-year return-10.6%+26.3%
5-year returnn/a+95.4%
Volatility (ann.)28.2%19.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.351.28
Max drawdown (3Y)-30.4%-22.8%
Market cap$83.2B
P/E (trailing)29.9
Dividend yield3.61%0.44%
Expense ratio0.18%
Assets under management$452.8B
Sector / categoryUS ListedETF · US Growth & Tech
Higher yield: BAM 3.61% vs 0.44%Smaller drawdown: QQQ -22.8% vs -30.4%

QQQ is a Large Growth fund from Invesco: $452.8B under management, 104 holdings, a 0.18% expense ratio, a 0.44% trailing dividend yield.

-25%0%+29%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. BAM · QQQ

Year-by-year returns

YearBAMQQQ
2022-32.6%
2023+45.6%+54.9%
2024+39.7%+25.6%
2025-0.2%+20.8%
2026+1.5%+17.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BAM and QQQ good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.62 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BAM and QQQ?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.62 over 3 years, with 0.55 over the last year and 0.59 over 5 years.

Is QQQ a good diversifier for BAM?

To a limited degree. At 0.62 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.62 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.62 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bam-vs-qqq.json

BAM vs QQQ: 3-year weekly correlation 0.62BAM vs QQQ0.62

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![BAM vs QQQ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bam-vs-qqq.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bam-vs-qqq/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BAM correlations · QQQ correlations