PairBook
HomeBAK › BAK vs BH

BAK vs BH: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Braskem SA ADR (BAK) and Biglari Holdings Inc. (BH) carry a correlation of -0.22, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.22
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.35
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.12
long-run
Ann. covariance
-636.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BAK and BH?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BAK and BH correlate at -0.22, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.35) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.22). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.12, with an annualized covariance of -636.4 %².

Among the 11 assets we track against BAK, BH sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #11. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months BH outperformed by 72.5 percentage points (-52.9% for BAK against +19.6% for BH).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BAK vs BH: side by side

BAK (Braskem SA ADR)BH (Biglari Holdings Inc.)
1-year return-52.9%+19.6%
5-year return-91.9%+115.0%
Volatility (ann.)63.5%45.1%
Beta vs S&P 5000.830.45
Max drawdown (3Y)-86.4%-48.0%
Market cap$0.7B$1.2B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: BH -48.0% vs -86.4%Higher 5y return: BH +115.0% vs -91.9%
-54%0%+50%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). BAK · BH

Year-by-year returns

YearBAKBH
2022-54.7%-2.6%
2023-4.1%+18.8%
2024-56.2%+54.2%
2025-23.6%+30.7%
2026-44.4%+14.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BAK and BH good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.22, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BAK and BH?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.22 over 3 years, with -0.35 over the last year and -0.12 over 5 years.

Is BH a good diversifier for BAK?

Yes: at -0.22, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.22 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bak-vs-bh.json

BAK vs BH: 3-year weekly correlation -0.22BAK vs BH-0.22

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![BAK vs BH correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bak-vs-bh.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bak-vs-bh/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BAK correlations · BH correlations