PairBook
HomeBAC › BAC vs SCHW

BAC vs SCHW: Correlation

How closely do Bank of America (BAC) and Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.57, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.57
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.45
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.63
long-run
Ann. covariance
423.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BAC and SCHW?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BAC and SCHW correlate at 0.57, moderate. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.45) runs below the 3-year figure (0.57). Stretching to 5 years gives 0.63, with an annualized covariance of 423.0 %².

Among the 45 assets we track against BAC, SCHW ranks #29 by 3-year correlation. Over the last 12 months BAC came out ahead by 11.1 percentage points (+24.1% against +13.0%). This link changes with the market regime, having swung between 0.37 and 0.87 on a rolling one-year basis.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
How the one-year correlation itself moved over the past three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BAC vs SCHW: side by side

BAC (Bank of America)SCHW (Charles Schwab Corporation)
1-year return+24.1%+13.0%
5-year return+66.0%+57.3%
Volatility (ann.)26.5%27.8%
Beta vs S&P 5001.110.93
Max drawdown (3Y)-27.5%-21.4%
Market cap$427.7B$186.9B
P/E (trailing)14.119.9
Dividend yield1.80%1.08%
Sector / categoryFinancialsFinancials
Lower P/E: BAC 14.1 vs 19.9Higher yield: BAC 1.80% vs 1.08%Smaller drawdown: SCHW -21.4% vs -27.5%Higher 5y return: BAC +66.0% vs +57.3%
-5%0%+32%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. BAC · SCHW

Year-by-year returns

YearBACSCHW
2022-23.8%+0.1%
2023+4.8%-16.0%
2024+33.9%+9.2%
2025+28.0%+36.6%
2026+12.4%+9.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BAC and SCHW good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.57 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BAC and SCHW?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BAC and SCHW is 0.57 over 3 years, 0.45 over 1 year and 0.63 over 5 years.

Is SCHW a good diversifier for BAC?

To a limited degree. At 0.57 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.57 mean?

A reading of 0.57 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bac-vs-schw.json

BAC vs SCHW: 3-year weekly correlation 0.57BAC vs SCHW0.57

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![BAC vs SCHW correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bac-vs-schw.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bac-vs-schw/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BAC correlations · SCHW correlations