PairBook
HomeBAC › BAC vs MGM

BAC vs MGM: Correlation

How closely do Bank of America (BAC) and MGM Resorts (MGM) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.55, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.55
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.44
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.54
long-run
Ann. covariance
512.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BAC and MGM?

On 3 years of weekly data the BAC/MGM correlation comes out at 0.55, moderate. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.44) runs below the 3-year figure (0.55). The 5-year figure is 0.54, and annualized covariance runs at 512.3 %².

Among the 45 assets we track against BAC, MGM ranks #30 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with BAC ahead by 16.1 points (+24.1% versus +8.0%). On a rolling one-year basis the correlation drifted between 0.47 and 0.72, a moderate band.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
Rolling one-year correlation of weekly returns over the past three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BAC vs MGM: side by side

BAC (Bank of America)MGM (MGM Resorts)
1-year return+24.1%+8.0%
5-year return+66.0%+0.8%
Volatility (ann.)26.5%35.2%
Beta vs S&P 5001.111.18
Max drawdown (3Y)-27.5%-46.0%
Market cap$427.7B$11.0B
P/E (trailing)14.126.4
Dividend yield1.80%0.00%
Sector / categoryFinancialsConsumer Discretionary
Lower P/E: BAC 14.1 vs 26.4Higher yield: BAC 1.80% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: BAC -27.5% vs -46.0%Higher 5y return: BAC +66.0% vs +0.8%
-15%0%+34%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. BAC · MGM

Year-by-year returns

YearBACMGM
2022-23.8%-25.3%
2023+4.8%+33.3%
2024+33.9%-22.4%
2025+28.0%+5.3%
2026+12.4%+17.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BAC and MGM good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.55 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BAC and MGM?

The BAC/MGM correlation stands at 0.55 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.44, 5 years: 0.54), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is MGM a good diversifier for BAC?

To a limited degree. At 0.55 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.55 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bac-vs-mgm.json

BAC vs MGM: 3-year weekly correlation 0.55BAC vs MGM0.55

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![BAC vs MGM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bac-vs-mgm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bac-vs-mgm/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BAC correlations · MGM correlations