PairBook
HomeBAC › BAC vs LNC

BAC vs LNC: Correlation

How closely do Bank of America (BAC) and Lincoln National Corporation (LNC) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.67, which is strong.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.67
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.49
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.65
long-run
Ann. covariance
598.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BAC and LNC?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BAC and LNC correlate at 0.67, strong. The past 12 months show a weaker link (0.49) than the 3-year average (0.67). Stretching to 5 years gives 0.65, with an annualized covariance of 598.6 %².

Among the 45 assets we track against BAC, LNC ranks #23 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: BAC led by 16.7 percentage points, +24.1% for BAC against +7.4% for LNC.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BAC vs LNC: side by side

BAC (Bank of America)LNC (Lincoln National Corporation)
1-year return+24.1%+7.4%
5-year return+66.0%-18.1%
Volatility (ann.)26.5%33.9%
Beta vs S&P 5001.111.14
Max drawdown (3Y)-27.5%-29.1%
Market cap$427.7B$8.3B
P/E (trailing)14.13.7
Dividend yield1.80%4.16%
Sector / categoryFinancialsUS Listed
Lower P/E: LNC 3.7 vs 14.1Higher yield: LNC 4.16% vs 1.80%Smaller drawdown: BAC -27.5% vs -29.1%Higher 5y return: BAC +66.0% vs -18.1%
-21%0%+32%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. BAC · LNC

Year-by-year returns

YearBACLNC
2022-23.8%-53.5%
2023+4.8%-5.6%
2024+33.9%+24.8%
2025+28.0%+48.0%
2026+12.4%+1.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BAC and LNC good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.67 means BAC and LNC share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BAC and LNC?

The BAC/LNC correlation stands at 0.67 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.49, 5 years: 0.65), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is LNC a good diversifier for BAC?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.67 means BAC and LNC share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.67 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bac-vs-lnc.json

BAC vs LNC: 3-year weekly correlation 0.67BAC vs LNC0.67

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![BAC vs LNC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bac-vs-lnc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bac-vs-lnc/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BAC correlations · LNC correlations