AWK vs JBL: Correlation
American Water Works (AWK) and Jabil (JBL) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.20.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are AWK and JBL?
On 3 years of weekly data the AWK/JBL correlation comes out at -0.20, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.22 over 1 year against -0.20 over 3. The 5-year figure is -0.03, and annualized covariance runs at -168.8 %².
Within AWK's tracked universe of 49 assets, JBL comes in at #26 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with JBL ahead by 53.4 points (-3.0% versus +50.4%). The relationship is regime-dependent: the rolling one-year correlation swung between -0.48 and 0.11 over the past three years, so this pair behaves very differently depending on the market environment. Note the risk asymmetry: JBL runs 2.0 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
AWK vs JBL: side by side
| AWK (American Water Works) | JBL (Jabil) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -3.0% | +50.4% |
| 5-year return | -16.6% | +405.5% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 20.7% | 40.6% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | -0.11 | 1.47 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -18.8% | -36.8% |
| Market cap | $27.2B | $32.7B |
| P/E (trailing) | 23.7 | 38.9 |
| Dividend yield | 2.46% | 0.10% |
| Sector / category | Utilities | Information Technology |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | AWK | JBL |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -17.9% | -2.5% |
| 2023 | -11.7% | +87.4% |
| 2024 | -3.5% | +13.3% |
| 2025 | +7.4% | +58.7% |
| 2026 | +6.9% | +37.0% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are AWK and JBL good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.20 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between AWK and JBL?
The AWK/JBL correlation stands at -0.20 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.22, 5 years: -0.03), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is JBL a good diversifier for AWK?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.20 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?
A reading of -0.20 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/awk-vs-jbl.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/awk-vs-jbl/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: AWK correlations · JBL correlations