PairBook
HomeATO › ATO vs DGZ

ATO vs DGZ: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Atmos Energy (ATO) and DB Gold Short ETN due February 15, 2038 (DGZ) carry a correlation of -0.23, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.23
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.27
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.23
long-run
Ann. covariance
-105.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ATO and DGZ?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of ATO and DGZ correlate at -0.23, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.27) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.23, with an annualized covariance of -105.2 %².

DGZ is close to the least connected end of ATO's tracked universe, ranking #28 of 32. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months ATO outperformed by 29.5 percentage points (+2.9% for ATO against -26.6% for DGZ). One caveat on sizing: DGZ is 1.8 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ATO vs DGZ: side by side

ATO (Atmos Energy)DGZ (DB Gold Short ETN due February 15, 2038)
1-year return+2.9%-26.6%
5-year return+94.1%-50.3%
Volatility (ann.)15.9%28.3%
Beta vs S&P 5000.15-0.18
Max drawdown (3Y)-12.7%-59.5%
Market cap$28.3B
P/E (trailing)19.9
Dividend yield2.28%
Sector / categoryUtilitiesUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: ATO -12.7% vs -59.5%Higher 5y return: ATO +94.1% vs -50.3%
-28%0%+16%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). ATO · DGZ

Year-by-year returns

YearATODGZ
2022+9.6%+4.9%
2023+6.2%-4.7%
2024+23.4%-16.5%
2025+23.1%-32.5%
2026+1.5%-10.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ATO and DGZ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.23, ATO and DGZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ATO and DGZ?

The ATO/DGZ correlation stands at -0.23 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.27, 5 years: -0.23), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is DGZ a good diversifier for ATO?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.23, ATO and DGZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.23 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.23 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ato-vs-dgz.json

ATO vs DGZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.23ATO vs DGZ-0.23

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![ATO vs DGZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ato-vs-dgz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ato-vs-dgz/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ATO correlations · DGZ correlations