PairBook
HomeASTC › ASTC vs COST

ASTC vs COST: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Astrotech Corporation (ASTC) and Costco (COST) carry a correlation of -0.21, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.21
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.36
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.13
long-run
Ann. covariance
-5106.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ASTC and COST?

Over the past 3 years, ASTC and COST moved with a correlation of -0.21, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.36) than the 3-year average (-0.21). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.13, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -5106.9 %².

By 3-year correlation, COST places #28 of the 47 assets tracked against ASTC. The last year tells two different stories: ASTC led by 38.5 percentage points, +37.5% for ASTC against -1.0% for COST. One caveat on sizing: ASTC is 61.0 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ASTC vs COST: side by side

ASTC (Astrotech Corporation)COST (Costco)
1-year return+37.5%-1.0%
5-year return-78.4%+116.3%
Volatility (ann.)1206.9%19.8%
Beta vs S&P 5004.810.45
Max drawdown (3Y)-87.5%-20.7%
Market cap$414.5B
P/E (trailing)48.1
Dividend yield0.00%0.56%
Sector / categoryUS ListedConsumer Staples
Higher yield: COST 0.56% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: COST -20.7% vs -87.5%Higher 5y return: COST +116.3% vs -78.4%
-54%0%+896%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. ASTC · COST

Year-by-year returns

YearASTCCOST
2022-51.0%-19.0%
2023-15.0%+49.0%
2024-20.8%+39.6%
2025-48.5%-5.4%
2026+105.8%+8.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ASTC and COST good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.21, ASTC and COST have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ASTC and COST?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between ASTC and COST is -0.21 over 3 years, -0.36 over 1 year and -0.13 over 5 years.

Is COST a good diversifier for ASTC?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.21, ASTC and COST have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.21 mean?

A reading of -0.21 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/astc-vs-cost.json

ASTC vs COST: 3-year weekly correlation -0.21ASTC vs COST-0.21

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![ASTC vs COST correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/astc-vs-cost.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/astc-vs-cost/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ASTC correlations · COST correlations