ASH vs VXZ: Correlation
How closely do Ashland Inc. (ASH) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.35, which is negative.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are ASH and VXZ?
On 3 years of weekly data the ASH/VXZ correlation comes out at -0.35, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.41 over 1 year against -0.35 over 3. The 5-year figure is -0.39, and annualized covariance runs at -285.1 %².
VXZ is close to the least connected end of ASH's tracked universe, ranking #11 of 12. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with ASH ahead by 50.8 points (+34.7% versus -16.1%).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
ASH vs VXZ: side by side
| ASH (Ashland Inc.) | VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +34.7% | -16.1% |
| 5-year return | -6.5% | -53.1% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 31.6% | 25.6% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.98 | -1.31 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -53.3% | -36.4% |
| Market cap | $3.4B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 47.7 | – |
| Dividend yield | 2.24% | – |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | ASH | VXZ |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +1.1% | +0.5% |
| 2023 | -20.2% | -44.0% |
| 2024 | -13.7% | -12.7% |
| 2025 | -15.4% | +5.7% |
| 2026 | +27.8% | -10.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are ASH and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?
Yes: at -0.35, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
FAQ
What is the correlation between ASH and VXZ?
The ASH/VXZ correlation stands at -0.35 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.41, 5 years: -0.39), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is VXZ a good diversifier for ASH?
Yes: at -0.35, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
What does a correlation of -0.35 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.35 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ash-vs-vxz.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ash-vs-vxz/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: ASH correlations · VXZ correlations
