PairBook
HomeAS › AS vs GGZ

AS vs GGZ: Correlation

How closely do Amer Sports, Inc. (AS) and Gabelli Global Small and Mid Cap Value Trust (The) (GGZ) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.43, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.43
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.56
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
349.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are AS and GGZ?

Over the past 3 years, AS and GGZ moved with a correlation of 0.43, which is moderate. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at 0.56 versus 0.43 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 349.1 %².

By 3-year correlation, GGZ places #4 of the 10 assets tracked against AS. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with GGZ ahead by 46.9 points (-25.7% versus +21.2%). Note the risk asymmetry: AS runs 2.7 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

AS vs GGZ: side by side

AS (Amer Sports, Inc.)GGZ (Gabelli Global Small and Mid Cap Value Trust (The))
1-year return-25.7%+21.2%
5-year returnn/a+37.8%
Volatility (ann.)48.0%17.8%
Beta vs S&P 5001.180.90
Max drawdown (3Y)-40.7%-17.8%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)31.85.6
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: GGZ 5.6 vs 31.8Smaller drawdown: GGZ -17.8% vs -40.7%
-19%0%+23%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. AS · GGZ

Year-by-year returns

YearASGGZ
2022-25.5%
2023+10.7%
2024+5.2%
2025+33.6%+34.9%
2026-18.3%+13.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are AS and GGZ good diversifiers for each other?

A fair diversifier. At 0.43, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

FAQ

What is the correlation between AS and GGZ?

The AS/GGZ correlation stands at 0.43 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.56, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is GGZ a good diversifier for AS?

A fair diversifier. At 0.43, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

What does a correlation of 0.43 mean?

A reading of 0.43 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/as-vs-ggz.json

AS vs GGZ: 3-year weekly correlation 0.43AS vs GGZ0.43

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![AS vs GGZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/as-vs-ggz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/as-vs-ggz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: AS correlations · GGZ correlations