PairBook
HomeARES › ARES vs VXZ

ARES vs VXZ: Correlation

Ares Management (ARES) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.46.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.46
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.23
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.52
long-run
Ann. covariance
-420.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ARES and VXZ?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of ARES and VXZ correlate at -0.46, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at -0.23 versus -0.46 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.52, with an annualized covariance of -420.3 %².

Out of 32 assets tracked against ARES, VXZ lands near the bottom at #30. Neither side won the trailing year by much: -17.7% against -16.1%.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ARES vs VXZ: side by side

ARES (Ares Management)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return-17.7%-16.1%
5-year return+118.7%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)35.5%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.55-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-50.0%-36.4%
Market cap$47.0B
P/E (trailing)65.0
Dividend yield3.48%
Sector / categoryFinancialsUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: VXZ -36.4% vs -50.0%Higher 5y return: ARES +118.7% vs -53.1%
-42%0%+9%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. ARES · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearARESVXZ
2022-12.8%+0.5%
2023+79.5%-44.0%
2024+52.7%-12.7%
2025-6.2%+5.7%
2026-9.8%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ARES and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.46 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ARES and VXZ?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.46 over 3 years, with -0.23 over the last year and -0.52 over 5 years.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for ARES?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.46 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.46 mean?

A reading of -0.46 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ares-vs-vxz.json

ARES vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.46ARES vs VXZ-0.46

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![ARES vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ares-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ares-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ARES correlations · VXZ correlations