PairBook
HomeARES › ARES vs LOCL

ARES vs LOCL: Correlation

Ares Management (ARES) and Local Bounti Corporation (LOCL) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.16.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.16
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.01
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.00
long-run
Ann. covariance
-810.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ARES and LOCL?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of ARES and LOCL correlate at -0.16, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at -0.01 versus -0.16 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.00, with an annualized covariance of -810.1 %².

Within ARES's tracked universe of 32 assets, LOCL comes in at #25 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months ARES outperformed by 41.1 percentage points (-17.7% for ARES against -58.8% for LOCL). One caveat on sizing: LOCL is 4.0 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ARES vs LOCL: side by side

ARES (Ares Management)LOCL (Local Bounti Corporation)
1-year return-17.7%-58.8%
5-year return+118.7%-99.2%
Volatility (ann.)35.5%142.7%
Beta vs S&P 5001.55-0.49
Max drawdown (3Y)-50.0%-79.4%
Market cap$47.0B
P/E (trailing)65.0
Dividend yield3.48%0.00%
Sector / categoryFinancialsUS Listed
Higher yield: ARES 3.48% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: ARES -50.0% vs -79.4%Higher 5y return: ARES +118.7% vs -99.2%
-57%0%+50%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). ARES · LOCL

Year-by-year returns

YearARESLOCL
2022-12.8%-78.4%
2023+79.5%-88.5%
2024+52.7%+0.0%
2025-6.2%+3.4%
2026-9.8%-53.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ARES and LOCL good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.16 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ARES and LOCL?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between ARES and LOCL is -0.16 over 3 years, -0.01 over 1 year and -0.00 over 5 years.

Is LOCL a good diversifier for ARES?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.16 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.16 mean?

A reading of -0.16 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ares-vs-locl.json

ARES vs LOCL: 3-year weekly correlation -0.16ARES vs LOCL-0.16

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![ARES vs LOCL correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ares-vs-locl.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ares-vs-locl/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ARES correlations · LOCL correlations