PairBook
HomeANAB › ANAB vs JL

ANAB vs JL: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, AnaptysBio, Inc. (ANAB) and J-Long Group Limited - Class A (JL) carry a correlation of -0.30, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.30
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.05
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-13568.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ANAB and JL?

On 3 years of weekly data the ANAB/JL correlation comes out at -0.30, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.05) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.30). The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -13568.4 %².

Among the 10 assets we track against ANAB, JL sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #10. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months ANAB outperformed by 337.6 percentage points (+321.2% for ANAB against -16.4% for JL). One caveat on sizing: JL is 7.7 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ANAB vs JL: side by side

ANAB (AnaptysBio, Inc.)JL (J-Long Group Limited - Class A)
1-year return+321.2%-16.4%
5-year return+243.9%n/a
Volatility (ann.)74.9%580.0%
Beta vs S&P 5001.03-1.02
Max drawdown (3Y)-69.3%-98.6%
Market cap$1.7B
P/E (trailing)6.5
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: ANAB -69.3% vs -98.6%
-41%0%+375%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). ANAB · JL

Year-by-year returns

YearANABJL
2022-10.8%
2023-30.9%
2024-38.2%
2025+266.2%+67.1%
2026+77.3%-20.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ANAB and JL good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.30, ANAB and JL have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ANAB and JL?

The ANAB/JL correlation stands at -0.30 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.05, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is JL a good diversifier for ANAB?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.30, ANAB and JL have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.30 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.30 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/anab-vs-jl.json

ANAB vs JL: 3-year weekly correlation -0.30ANAB vs JL-0.30

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![ANAB vs JL correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/anab-vs-jl.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/anab-vs-jl/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ANAB correlations · JL correlations