PairBook
HomeAMZE › AMZE vs CTSH

AMZE vs CTSH: Correlation

How closely do Amaze Holdings, Inc. (AMZE) and Cognizant (CTSH) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.20, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.34
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.11
long-run
Ann. covariance
-883.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are AMZE and CTSH?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of AMZE and CTSH correlate at -0.20, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.34 versus -0.20 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.11, with an annualized covariance of -883.8 %².

Out of 13 assets tracked against AMZE, CTSH lands near the bottom at #10. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with CTSH ahead by 89.5 points (-99.3% versus -9.8%). Risk is not evenly split, since AMZE carries 4.3 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

AMZE vs CTSH: side by side

AMZE (Amaze Holdings, Inc.)CTSH (Cognizant)
1-year return-99.3%-9.8%
5-year return-100.0%-9.6%
Volatility (ann.)139.4%32.3%
Beta vs S&P 5001.680.89
Max drawdown (3Y)-99.9%-56.1%
Market cap$28.7B
P/E (trailing)13.3
Dividend yield0.00%2.09%
Sector / categoryUS ListedInformation Technology
Higher yield: CTSH 2.09% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: CTSH -56.1% vs -99.9%Higher 5y return: CTSH -9.6% vs -100.0%
-99%0%+82%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. AMZE · CTSH

Year-by-year returns

YearAMZECTSH
2022-80.8%-34.5%
2023-7.0%+34.4%
2024-36.0%+3.5%
2025-97.2%+9.7%
2026-94.4%-21.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are AMZE and CTSH good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.20, AMZE and CTSH have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between AMZE and CTSH?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.20 over 3 years, with -0.34 over the last year and -0.11 over 5 years.

Is CTSH a good diversifier for AMZE?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.20, AMZE and CTSH have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

A reading of -0.20 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/amze-vs-ctsh.json

AMZE vs CTSH: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20AMZE vs CTSH-0.20

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![AMZE vs CTSH correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/amze-vs-ctsh.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/amze-vs-ctsh/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: AMZE correlations · CTSH correlations