AMTB vs VXZ: Correlation
Amerant Bancorp Inc. (AMTB) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.53.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are AMTB and VXZ?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of AMTB and VXZ correlate at -0.53, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at -0.28 versus -0.53 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.45, with an annualized covariance of -465.4 %².
Among the 11 assets we track against AMTB, VXZ sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #11. The last year tells two different stories: AMTB led by 52.8 percentage points, +36.7% for AMTB against -16.1% for VXZ.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
AMTB vs VXZ: side by side
| AMTB (Amerant Bancorp Inc.) | VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +36.7% | -16.1% |
| 5-year return | +17.3% | -53.1% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 34.6% | 25.6% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.99 | -1.31 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -36.9% | -36.4% |
| Market cap | $1.1B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 20.6 | – |
| Dividend yield | 1.26% | – |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | AMTB | VXZ |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -21.4% | +0.5% |
| 2023 | -6.8% | -44.0% |
| 2024 | -7.3% | -12.7% |
| 2025 | -11.3% | +5.7% |
| 2026 | +49.4% | -10.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are AMTB and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?
Yes: at -0.53, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
FAQ
What is the correlation between AMTB and VXZ?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.53 over 3 years, with -0.28 over the last year and -0.45 over 5 years.
Is VXZ a good diversifier for AMTB?
Yes: at -0.53, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
What does a correlation of -0.53 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/amtb-vs-vxz.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/amtb-vs-vxz/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: AMTB correlations · VXZ correlations