PairBook
HomeAMT › AMT vs HQY

AMT vs HQY: Correlation

How closely do American Tower (AMT) and HealthEquity, Inc. (HQY) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.21, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.21
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.04
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.12
long-run
Ann. covariance
-184.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are AMT and HQY?

On 3 years of weekly data the AMT/HQY correlation comes out at -0.21, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at -0.04 versus -0.21 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is -0.12, and annualized covariance runs at -184.7 %².

Out of 30 assets tracked against AMT, HQY lands near the bottom at #30. The last year tells two different stories: HQY led by 17.1 percentage points, -11.0% for AMT against +6.1% for HQY.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

AMT vs HQY: side by side

AMT (American Tower)HQY (HealthEquity, Inc.)
1-year return-11.0%+6.1%
5-year return-30.2%+45.4%
Volatility (ann.)27.1%32.9%
Beta vs S&P 5000.180.63
Max drawdown (3Y)-28.4%-36.1%
Market cap$81.2B$7.7B
P/E (trailing)24.239.1
Dividend yield3.97%0.00%
Sector / categoryReal EstateUS Listed
Lower P/E: AMT 24.2 vs 39.1Higher yield: AMT 3.97% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: AMT -28.4% vs -36.1%Higher 5y return: HQY +45.4% vs -30.2%
-19%0%+15%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. AMT · HQY

Year-by-year returns

YearAMTHQY
2022-25.7%+39.3%
2023+5.4%+7.6%
2024-12.2%+44.7%
2025-0.9%-4.5%
2026+1.1%+1.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are AMT and HQY good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.21 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between AMT and HQY?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.21 over 3 years, with -0.04 over the last year and -0.12 over 5 years.

Is HQY a good diversifier for AMT?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.21 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.21 mean?

A reading of -0.21 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/amt-vs-hqy.json

AMT vs HQY: 3-year weekly correlation -0.21AMT vs HQY-0.21

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![AMT vs HQY correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/amt-vs-hqy.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/amt-vs-hqy/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: AMT correlations · HQY correlations