PairBook
HomeAMS › AMS vs QH

AMS vs QH: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, American Shared Hospital Services (AMS) and Quhuo Limited - Class A (QH) carry a correlation of 0.37, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.37
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.46
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.32
long-run
Ann. covariance
23509.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are AMS and QH?

Over the past 3 years, AMS and QH moved with a correlation of 0.37, which is moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.46 over 1 year against 0.37 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.32, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 23509.5 %².

Few assets follow AMS as closely as QH, which ranks #2 of 11 tracked partners. The last year tells two different stories: QH led by 32.6 percentage points, -40.7% for AMS against -8.1% for QH. Note the risk asymmetry: QH runs 29.2 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

AMS vs QH: side by side

AMS (American Shared Hospital Services)QH (Quhuo Limited - Class A)
1-year return-40.7%-8.1%
5-year return-45.7%-100.0%
Volatility (ann.)46.6%1360.1%
Beta vs S&P 5000.345.77
Max drawdown (3Y)-64.2%-100.0%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: AMS -64.2% vs -100.0%Higher 5y return: AMS -45.7% vs -100.0%
-99%0%+109%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. AMS · QH

Year-by-year returns

YearAMSQH
2022+23.6%-98.9%
2023-18.8%+22.5%
2024+34.0%-0.7%
2025-33.9%-99.2%
2026-30.8%+290.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are AMS and QH good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.37 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between AMS and QH?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between AMS and QH is 0.37 over 3 years, 0.46 over 1 year and 0.32 over 5 years.

Is QH a good diversifier for AMS?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.37 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.37 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ams-vs-qh.json

AMS vs QH: 3-year weekly correlation 0.37AMS vs QH0.37

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![AMS vs QH correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ams-vs-qh.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ams-vs-qh/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: AMS correlations · QH correlations