PairBook
HomeAMR › AMR vs METC

AMR vs METC: Correlation

How closely do Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR) and Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.49, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.49
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.35
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.55
long-run
Ann. covariance
2379.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are AMR and METC?

Over the past 3 years, AMR and METC moved with a correlation of 0.49, which is moderate. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.35) runs below the 3-year figure (0.49). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.55, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 2379.7 %².

Among the 12 assets we track against AMR, METC ranks #5 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with AMR ahead by 101.2 points (+56.1% versus -45.1%). One caveat on sizing: METC is 1.5 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

AMR vs METC: side by side

AMR (Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.)METC (Ramaco Resources, Inc.)
1-year return+56.1%-45.1%
5-year return+514.2%+83.2%
Volatility (ann.)56.0%86.1%
Beta vs S&P 5001.131.13
Max drawdown (3Y)-77.5%-83.7%
Market cap$2.9B$0.9B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: AMR -77.5% vs -83.7%Higher 5y return: AMR +514.2% vs +83.2%
-68%0%+68%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. AMR · METC

Year-by-year returns

YearAMRMETC
2022+150.1%-33.0%
2023+133.9%+105.9%
2024-41.0%-37.9%
2025-0.1%+77.9%
2026+13.8%-22.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are AMR and METC good diversifiers for each other?

Reasonably. At 0.49, AMR and METC keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between AMR and METC?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.49 over 3 years, with 0.35 over the last year and 0.55 over 5 years.

Is METC a good diversifier for AMR?

Reasonably. At 0.49, AMR and METC keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.49 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/amr-vs-metc.json

AMR vs METC: 3-year weekly correlation 0.49AMR vs METC0.49

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![AMR vs METC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/amr-vs-metc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/amr-vs-metc/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: AMR correlations · METC correlations