PairBook
HomeAMD › AMD vs PACS

AMD vs PACS: Correlation

How closely do Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) and PACS Group, Inc. (PACS) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.17, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.17
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.36
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1152.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are AMD and PACS?

Over the past 3 years, AMD and PACS moved with a correlation of -0.17, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.36 versus -0.17 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -1152.5 %².

By 3-year correlation, PACS places #25 of the 33 assets tracked against AMD. The last year tells two different stories: PACS led by 87.8 percentage points, +185.2% for AMD against +273.0% for PACS. Risk is not evenly split, since PACS carries 2.2 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

AMD vs PACS: side by side

AMD (Advanced Micro Devices)PACS (PACS Group, Inc.)
1-year return+185.2%+273.0%
5-year return+328.2%n/a
Volatility (ann.)55.7%120.5%
Beta vs S&P 5002.040.06
Max drawdown (3Y)-63.0%-82.0%
Market cap$778.2B$7.0B
P/E (trailing)121.925.9
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryInformation TechnologyUS Listed
Lower P/E: PACS 25.9 vs 121.9Smaller drawdown: AMD -63.0% vs -82.0%
-13%0%+334%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). AMD · PACS

Year-by-year returns

YearAMDPACS
2022-55.0%
2023+127.6%
2024-18.1%
2025+77.3%+192.8%
2026+122.6%+15.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are AMD and PACS good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.17, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between AMD and PACS?

The AMD/PACS correlation stands at -0.17 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.36, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is PACS a good diversifier for AMD?

Yes: at -0.17, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.17 mean?

A reading of -0.17 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/amd-vs-pacs.json

AMD vs PACS: 3-year weekly correlation -0.17AMD vs PACS-0.17

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![AMD vs PACS correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/amd-vs-pacs.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/amd-vs-pacs/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: AMD correlations · PACS correlations