AMC vs BCH: Correlation
AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. (AMC) and Banco De Chile (BCH) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.36.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are AMC and BCH?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of AMC and BCH correlate at 0.36, moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.45 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.19, with an annualized covariance of 703.7 %².
Within AMC's tracked universe of 11 assets, BCH comes in at #4 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with BCH ahead by 60.3 points (-4.9% versus +55.4%). Risk is not evenly split, since AMC carries 3.2 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
AMC vs BCH: side by side
| AMC (AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc.) | BCH (Banco De Chile) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -4.9% | +55.4% |
| 5-year return | -99.4% | +219.8% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 79.7% | 24.6% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.44 | 0.63 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -93.0% | -20.0% |
| Market cap | – | $21.0B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 15.8 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | AMC | BCH |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -85.0% | +41.2% |
| 2023 | -85.0% | +23.4% |
| 2024 | -35.0% | +6.1% |
| 2025 | -60.8% | +81.2% |
| 2026 | +73.1% | +16.1% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are AMC and BCH good diversifiers for each other?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.36 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between AMC and BCH?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between AMC and BCH is 0.36 over 3 years, 0.45 over 1 year and 0.19 over 5 years.
Is BCH a good diversifier for AMC?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.36 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.36 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/amc-vs-bch.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/amc-vs-bch/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: AMC correlations · BCH correlations
