PairBook
HomeAMBP › AMBP vs VXZ

AMBP vs VXZ: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A. (AMBP) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) carry a correlation of -0.31, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.31
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.35
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.35
long-run
Ann. covariance
-340.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are AMBP and VXZ?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of AMBP and VXZ correlate at -0.31, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.35 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.35, with an annualized covariance of -340.6 %².

VXZ is close to the least connected end of AMBP's tracked universe, ranking #12 of 12. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with AMBP ahead by 63.1 points (+47.0% versus -16.1%). Risk is not evenly split, since AMBP carries 1.7 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

AMBP vs VXZ: side by side

AMBP (Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A.)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return+47.0%-16.1%
5-year return-26.6%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)43.0%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.71-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-39.2%-36.4%
Market cap$3.1B
P/E (trailing)103.4
Dividend yield7.65%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: VXZ -36.4% vs -39.2%Higher 5y return: AMBP -26.6% vs -53.1%
-16%0%+57%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. AMBP · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearAMBPVXZ
2022-42.5%+0.5%
2023-11.5%-44.0%
2024-12.4%-12.7%
2025+49.2%+5.7%
2026+32.3%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are AMBP and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.31, AMBP and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between AMBP and VXZ?

The AMBP/VXZ correlation stands at -0.31 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.35, 5 years: -0.35), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for AMBP?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.31, AMBP and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.31 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.31 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ambp-vs-vxz.json

AMBP vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.31AMBP vs VXZ-0.31

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![AMBP vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ambp-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ambp-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: AMBP correlations · VXZ correlations