PairBook
HomeAMBA › AMBA vs BSTZ

AMBA vs BSTZ: Correlation

How closely do Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) and BlackRock Science and Technology Term Trust (BSTZ) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.55, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.55
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.37
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.54
long-run
Ann. covariance
775.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are AMBA and BSTZ?

Over the past 3 years, AMBA and BSTZ moved with a correlation of 0.55, which is moderate. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.37) runs below the 3-year figure (0.55). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.54, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 775.1 %².

Few assets follow AMBA as closely as BSTZ, which ranks #1 of 10 tracked partners. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months BSTZ outperformed by 58.5 percentage points (-1.1% for AMBA against +57.4% for BSTZ). One caveat on sizing: AMBA is 2.5 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

AMBA vs BSTZ: side by side

AMBA (Ambarella, Inc.)BSTZ (BlackRock Science and Technology Term Trust)
1-year return-1.1%+57.4%
5-year return-32.5%+31.6%
Volatility (ann.)59.8%23.7%
Beta vs S&P 5002.141.19
Max drawdown (3Y)-51.4%-25.3%
Market cap$3.1B$2.1B
P/E (trailing)6.7
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: BSTZ -25.3% vs -51.4%Higher 5y return: BSTZ +31.6% vs -32.5%
-39%0%+59%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). AMBA · BSTZ

Year-by-year returns

YearAMBABSTZ
2022-59.5%-55.3%
2023-25.5%+18.7%
2024+18.7%+37.5%
2025-2.6%+25.1%
2026+0.5%+44.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are AMBA and BSTZ good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.55 means AMBA and BSTZ share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between AMBA and BSTZ?

The AMBA/BSTZ correlation stands at 0.55 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.37, 5 years: 0.54), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is BSTZ a good diversifier for AMBA?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.55 means AMBA and BSTZ share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.55 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/amba-vs-bstz.json

AMBA vs BSTZ: 3-year weekly correlation 0.55AMBA vs BSTZ0.55

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![AMBA vs BSTZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/amba-vs-bstz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/amba-vs-bstz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: AMBA correlations · BSTZ correlations