PairBook
HomeAMAT › AMAT vs CAG

AMAT vs CAG: Correlation

How closely do Applied Materials (AMAT) and ConAgra Brands, Inc. (CAG) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.19, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.19
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.16
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.10
long-run
Ann. covariance
-203.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are AMAT and CAG?

On 3 years of weekly data the AMAT/CAG correlation comes out at -0.19, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.16 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.10, and annualized covariance runs at -203.9 %².

Among the 34 assets we track against AMAT, CAG ranks #29 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: AMAT led by 204.8 percentage points, +195.0% for AMAT against -9.8% for CAG. Risk is not evenly split, since AMAT carries 1.8 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

AMAT vs CAG: side by side

AMAT (Applied Materials)CAG (ConAgra Brands, Inc.)
1-year return+195.0%-9.8%
5-year return+269.5%-36.6%
Volatility (ann.)43.5%24.2%
Beta vs S&P 5001.69-0.05
Max drawdown (3Y)-49.9%-56.7%
Market cap$382.8B$7.7B
P/E (trailing)41.3
Dividend yield0.41%8.65%
Sector / categoryInformation TechnologyUS Listed
Higher yield: CAG 8.65% vs 0.41%Smaller drawdown: AMAT -49.9% vs -56.7%Higher 5y return: AMAT +269.5% vs -36.6%
-28%0%+287%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. AMAT · CAG

Year-by-year returns

YearAMATCAG
2022-37.5%+17.5%
2023+68.0%-22.8%
2024+1.1%+1.5%
2025+59.6%-33.3%
2026+88.4%-2.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are AMAT and CAG good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.19, AMAT and CAG have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between AMAT and CAG?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between AMAT and CAG is -0.19 over 3 years, -0.16 over 1 year and -0.10 over 5 years.

Is CAG a good diversifier for AMAT?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.19, AMAT and CAG have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?

A reading of -0.19 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/amat-vs-cag.json

AMAT vs CAG: 3-year weekly correlation -0.19AMAT vs CAG-0.19

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![AMAT vs CAG correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/amat-vs-cag.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/amat-vs-cag/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: AMAT correlations · CAG correlations