PairBook
HomeAM › AM vs WAT

AM vs WAT: Correlation

How closely do Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) and Waters Corporation (WAT) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.22, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.22
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.56
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.00
long-run
Ann. covariance
-171.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are AM and WAT?

Over the past 3 years, AM and WAT moved with a correlation of -0.22, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.56 versus -0.22 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.00, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -171.8 %².

Out of 15 assets tracked against AM, WAT lands near the bottom at #12. The trailing year gives WAT the advantage: +33.1% versus +43.0%, a 9.9-point spread. Risk is not evenly split, since WAT carries 1.6 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

AM vs WAT: side by side

AM (Antero Midstream Corporation)WAT (Waters Corporation)
1-year return+33.1%+43.0%
5-year return+230.4%+2.0%
Volatility (ann.)22.6%35.3%
Beta vs S&P 5000.240.89
Max drawdown (3Y)-14.0%-33.4%
Market cap$10.7B$41.4B
P/E (trailing)27.1105.3
Dividend yield3.98%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedHealth Care
Lower P/E: AM 27.1 vs 105.3Higher yield: AM 3.98% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: AM -14.0% vs -33.4%Higher 5y return: AM +230.4% vs +2.0%
-6%0%+38%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. AM · WAT

Year-by-year returns

YearAMWAT
2022+22.0%-8.1%
2023+25.7%-3.9%
2024+28.5%+12.7%
2025+24.4%+2.4%
2026+30.9%+10.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are AM and WAT good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.22 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between AM and WAT?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.22 over 3 years, with -0.56 over the last year and -0.00 over 5 years.

Is WAT a good diversifier for AM?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.22 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.22 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/am-vs-wat.json

AM vs WAT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.22AM vs WAT-0.22

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![AM vs WAT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/am-vs-wat.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/am-vs-wat/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: AM correlations · WAT correlations