ALMU vs VTR: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Aeluma, Inc. (ALMU) and Ventas (VTR) carry a correlation of -0.24, a negative link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are ALMU and VTR?
Over the past 3 years, ALMU and VTR moved with a correlation of -0.24, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.18) sits close to the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -539.5 %².
Within ALMU's tracked universe of 20 assets, VTR comes in at #14 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with VTR ahead by 72.8 points (-32.4% versus +40.4%). Risk is not evenly split, since ALMU carries 5.0 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
ALMU vs VTR: side by side
| ALMU (Aeluma, Inc.) | VTR (Ventas) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -32.4% | +40.4% |
| 5-year return | n/a | +98.1% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 106.9% | 21.5% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.15 | 0.25 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -56.7% | -16.7% |
| Market cap | $0.3B | $47.6B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 168.9 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.14% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | Real Estate |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | ALMU | VTR |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | – | -8.5% |
| 2023 | – | +15.1% |
| 2024 | +163.8% | +22.2% |
| 2025 | +124.4% | +35.1% |
| 2026 | -18.9% | +21.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are ALMU and VTR good diversifiers for each other?
Yes: at -0.24, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
FAQ
What is the correlation between ALMU and VTR?
The ALMU/VTR correlation stands at -0.24 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.18, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is VTR a good diversifier for ALMU?
Yes: at -0.24, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
What does a correlation of -0.24 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/almu-vs-vtr.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/almu-vs-vtr/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: ALMU correlations · VTR correlations