PairBook
HomeALMU › ALMU vs VTR

ALMU vs VTR: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Aeluma, Inc. (ALMU) and Ventas (VTR) carry a correlation of -0.24, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.24
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.18
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-539.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ALMU and VTR?

Over the past 3 years, ALMU and VTR moved with a correlation of -0.24, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.18) sits close to the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -539.5 %².

Within ALMU's tracked universe of 20 assets, VTR comes in at #14 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with VTR ahead by 72.8 points (-32.4% versus +40.4%). Risk is not evenly split, since ALMU carries 5.0 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ALMU vs VTR: side by side

ALMU (Aeluma, Inc.)VTR (Ventas)
1-year return-32.4%+40.4%
5-year returnn/a+98.1%
Volatility (ann.)106.9%21.5%
Beta vs S&P 5001.150.25
Max drawdown (3Y)-56.7%-16.7%
Market cap$0.3B$47.6B
P/E (trailing)168.9
Dividend yield0.00%2.14%
Sector / categoryUS ListedReal Estate
Higher yield: VTR 2.14% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: VTR -16.7% vs -56.7%
-38%0%+52%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. ALMU · VTR

Year-by-year returns

YearALMUVTR
2022-8.5%
2023+15.1%
2024+163.8%+22.2%
2025+124.4%+35.1%
2026-18.9%+21.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ALMU and VTR good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.24, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ALMU and VTR?

The ALMU/VTR correlation stands at -0.24 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.18, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is VTR a good diversifier for ALMU?

Yes: at -0.24, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.24 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/almu-vs-vtr.json

ALMU vs VTR: 3-year weekly correlation -0.24ALMU vs VTR-0.24

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![ALMU vs VTR correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/almu-vs-vtr.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/almu-vs-vtr/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ALMU correlations · VTR correlations