PairBook
HomeALMU › ALMU vs TIP

ALMU vs TIP: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Aeluma, Inc. (ALMU) and iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) carry a correlation of -0.22, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.22
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.03
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-100.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ALMU and TIP?

Over the past 3 years, ALMU and TIP moved with a correlation of -0.22, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.03) than the 3-year average (-0.22). Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -100.8 %².

Among the 20 assets we track against ALMU, TIP ranks #11 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months TIP outperformed by 33.8 percentage points (-32.4% for ALMU against +1.4% for TIP). Risk is not evenly split, since ALMU carries 24.3 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ALMU vs TIP: side by side

ALMU (Aeluma, Inc.)TIP (iShares TIPS Bond ETF)
1-year return-32.4%+1.4%
5-year returnn/a+1.2%
Volatility (ann.)106.9%4.4%
Beta vs S&P 5001.150.05
Max drawdown (3Y)-56.7%-3.7%
Market cap$0.3B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%4.47%
Expense ratio0.18%
Assets under management$14.6B
Sector / categoryUS ListedETF · Bonds
Higher yield: TIP 4.47% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: TIP -3.7% vs -56.7%

TIP is an Inflation-Protected Bond fund from iShares: $14.6B under management, a 0.18% expense ratio, a 4.47% trailing dividend yield.

-38%0%+47%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. ALMU · TIP

Year-by-year returns

YearALMUTIP
2022-12.3%
2023+3.8%
2024+163.8%+1.7%
2025+124.4%+6.8%
2026-18.9%+1.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ALMU and TIP good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.22, ALMU and TIP have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ALMU and TIP?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between ALMU and TIP is -0.22 over 3 years, 0.03 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.

Is TIP a good diversifier for ALMU?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.22, ALMU and TIP have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/almu-vs-tip.json

ALMU vs TIP: 3-year weekly correlation -0.22ALMU vs TIP-0.22

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![ALMU vs TIP correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/almu-vs-tip.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/almu-vs-tip/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ALMU correlations · TIP correlations