PairBook
HomeALMU › ALMU vs FTS

ALMU vs FTS: Correlation

How closely do Aeluma, Inc. (ALMU) and Fortis Inc. (FTS) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.24, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.24
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.13
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-374.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ALMU and FTS?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of ALMU and FTS correlate at -0.24, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.13) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.24). Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of -374.7 %².

Within ALMU's tracked universe of 20 assets, FTS comes in at #12 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months FTS outperformed by 44.8 percentage points (-32.4% for ALMU against +12.4% for FTS). Risk is not evenly split, since ALMU carries 7.3 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ALMU vs FTS: side by side

ALMU (Aeluma, Inc.)FTS (Fortis Inc.)
1-year return-32.4%+12.4%
5-year returnn/a+43.4%
Volatility (ann.)106.9%14.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.150.04
Max drawdown (3Y)-56.7%-11.6%
Market cap$0.3B$28.0B
P/E (trailing)22.5
Dividend yield0.00%4.58%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: FTS 4.58% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: FTS -11.6% vs -56.7%
-38%0%+47%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. ALMU · FTS

Year-by-year returns

YearALMUFTS
2022-13.9%
2023+7.0%
2024+163.8%+5.4%
2025+124.4%+28.5%
2026-18.9%+8.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ALMU and FTS good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.24, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ALMU and FTS?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between ALMU and FTS is -0.24 over 3 years, -0.13 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.

Is FTS a good diversifier for ALMU?

Yes: at -0.24, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.24 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/almu-vs-fts.json

ALMU vs FTS: 3-year weekly correlation -0.24ALMU vs FTS-0.24

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![ALMU vs FTS correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/almu-vs-fts.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/almu-vs-fts/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ALMU correlations · FTS correlations