PairBook
HomeALL › ALL vs XLF

ALL vs XLF: Correlation

Allstate (ALL) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.50.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.50
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.38
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.55
long-run
Ann. covariance
177.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ALL and XLF?

On 3 years of weekly data the ALL/XLF correlation comes out at 0.50, moderate. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.38) runs below the 3-year figure (0.50). The 5-year figure is 0.55, and annualized covariance runs at 177.7 %².

Within ALL's tracked universe of 32 assets, XLF comes in at #18 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: ALL led by 19.6 percentage points, +28.9% for ALL against +9.3% for XLF. On a rolling one-year basis the correlation drifted between 0.31 and 0.72, a moderate band.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
One-year correlation, rolled weekly across the last three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ALL vs XLF: side by side

ALL (Allstate)XLF (Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund)
1-year return+28.9%+9.3%
5-year return+114.7%+64.2%
Volatility (ann.)22.1%16.2%
Beta vs S&P 5000.310.84
Max drawdown (3Y)-14.1%-15.5%
Market cap$65.1B
P/E (trailing)5.2
Dividend yield1.59%1.42%
Expense ratio0.08%
Assets under management$57.9B
Sector / categoryFinancialsSector ETF
Higher yield: ALL 1.59% vs 1.42%Smaller drawdown: ALL -14.1% vs -15.5%Higher 5y return: ALL +114.7% vs +64.2%

XLF is a Financial fund from State Street Investment Management: $57.9B under management, 77 holdings, a 0.08% expense ratio, a 1.42% trailing dividend yield.

-9%0%+34%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). ALL · XLF

Year-by-year returns

YearALLXLF
2022+18.4%-10.6%
2023+6.4%+12.0%
2024+40.6%+30.6%
2025+10.1%+14.9%
2026+25.0%+6.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Fund exposure

A structural note: 0.82% of XLF is ALL itself, so the fund partly moves with the stock by construction.

Are ALL and XLF good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.50 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ALL and XLF?

The ALL/XLF correlation stands at 0.50 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.38, 5 years: 0.55), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is XLF a good diversifier for ALL?

To a limited degree. At 0.50 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.50 mean?

A reading of 0.50 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/all-vs-xlf.json

ALL vs XLF: 3-year weekly correlation 0.50ALL vs XLF0.50

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![ALL vs XLF correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/all-vs-xlf.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/all-vs-xlf/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ALL correlations · XLF correlations