PairBook
HomeALL › ALL vs RMCF

ALL vs RMCF: Correlation

How closely do Allstate (ALL) and Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc. (RMCF) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.21, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.21
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.25
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.13
long-run
Ann. covariance
-314.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ALL and RMCF?

Over the past 3 years, ALL and RMCF moved with a correlation of -0.21, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.25 over 1 year against -0.21 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.13, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -314.5 %².

Within ALL's tracked universe of 32 assets, RMCF comes in at #25 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months ALL outperformed by 48.8 percentage points (+28.9% for ALL against -19.9% for RMCF). Risk is not evenly split, since RMCF carries 3.1 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ALL vs RMCF: side by side

ALL (Allstate)RMCF (Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc.)
1-year return+28.9%-19.9%
5-year return+114.7%-84.3%
Volatility (ann.)22.1%68.5%
Beta vs S&P 5000.310.77
Max drawdown (3Y)-14.1%-87.0%
Market cap$65.1B
P/E (trailing)5.2
Dividend yield1.59%0.00%
Sector / categoryFinancialsUS Listed
Higher yield: ALL 1.59% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: ALL -14.1% vs -87.0%Higher 5y return: ALL +114.7% vs -84.3%
-46%0%+79%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. ALL · RMCF

Year-by-year returns

YearALLRMCF
2022+18.4%-27.4%
2023+6.4%-19.3%
2024+40.6%-47.2%
2025+10.1%-21.8%
2026+25.0%-38.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ALL and RMCF good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.21 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ALL and RMCF?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between ALL and RMCF is -0.21 over 3 years, -0.25 over 1 year and -0.13 over 5 years.

Is RMCF a good diversifier for ALL?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.21 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.21 mean?

A reading of -0.21 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/all-vs-rmcf.json

ALL vs RMCF: 3-year weekly correlation -0.21ALL vs RMCF-0.21

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![ALL vs RMCF correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/all-vs-rmcf.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/all-vs-rmcf/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ALL correlations · RMCF correlations