ALB vs VT: Correlation
Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.49.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are ALB and VT?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of ALB and VT correlate at 0.49, moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.39 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.54, with an annualized covariance of 371.4 %².
Among the 36 assets we track against ALB, VT ranks #15 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with ALB ahead by 34.2 points (+56.9% versus +22.7%). The rolling one-year correlation moved between 0.33 and 0.66 over the past three years, a moderate range. Note the risk asymmetry: ALB runs 3.9 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
ALB vs VT: side by side
| ALB (Albemarle Corporation) | VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +56.9% | +22.7% |
| 5-year return | -39.2% | +67.7% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 54.3% | 13.9% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.62 | 0.92 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -74.1% | -16.5% |
| Market cap | $16.0B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 502.9 | – |
| Dividend yield | 1.20% | 1.59% |
| Expense ratio | – | 0.06% |
| Assets under management | – | $97.9B |
| Sector / category | Materials | ETF · Global |
VT is a Global Large-Stock Blend fund from Vanguard: $97.9B under management, 5308 holdings, a 0.06% expense ratio, a 1.59% trailing dividend yield.
Year-by-year returns
| Year | ALB | VT |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -6.6% | -18.0% |
| 2023 | -32.8% | +22.0% |
| 2024 | -39.5% | +16.5% |
| 2025 | +67.7% | +22.4% |
| 2026 | -3.5% | +15.2% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are ALB and VT good diversifiers for each other?
A fair diversifier. At 0.49, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
FAQ
What is the correlation between ALB and VT?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between ALB and VT is 0.49 over 3 years, 0.39 over 1 year and 0.54 over 5 years.
Is VT a good diversifier for ALB?
A fair diversifier. At 0.49, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
What does a correlation of 0.49 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.49 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/alb-vs-vt.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/alb-vs-vt/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: ALB correlations · VT correlations
