PairBook
HomeALB › ALB vs IHT

ALB vs IHT: Correlation

How closely do Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and InnSuites Hospitality Trust Shares of Beneficial Interest (IHT) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.14, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.14
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.12
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.02
long-run
Ann. covariance
-421.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ALB and IHT?

Over the past 3 years, ALB and IHT moved with a correlation of -0.14, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.12) sits close to the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.02, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -421.6 %².

Within ALB's tracked universe of 36 assets, IHT comes in at #27 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with ALB ahead by 90.7 points (+56.9% versus -33.8%).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ALB vs IHT: side by side

ALB (Albemarle Corporation)IHT (InnSuites Hospitality Trust Shares of Beneficial Interest)
1-year return+56.9%-33.8%
5-year return-39.2%-63.6%
Volatility (ann.)54.3%55.0%
Beta vs S&P 5001.620.07
Max drawdown (3Y)-74.1%-69.6%
Market cap$16.0B
P/E (trailing)502.9
Dividend yield1.20%1.44%
Sector / categoryMaterialsUS Listed
Higher yield: IHT 1.44% vs 1.20%Smaller drawdown: IHT -69.6% vs -74.1%Higher 5y return: ALB -39.2% vs -63.6%
-44%0%+152%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. ALB · IHT

Year-by-year returns

YearALBIHT
2022-6.6%-22.9%
2023-32.8%+2.3%
2024-39.5%+29.5%
2025+67.7%-37.4%
2026-3.5%-3.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ALB and IHT good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.14, ALB and IHT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ALB and IHT?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.14 over 3 years, with -0.12 over the last year and 0.02 over 5 years.

Is IHT a good diversifier for ALB?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.14, ALB and IHT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.14 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.14 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/alb-vs-iht.json

ALB vs IHT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.14ALB vs IHT-0.14

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![ALB vs IHT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/alb-vs-iht.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/alb-vs-iht/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ALB correlations · IHT correlations