PairBook
HomeALB › ALB vs IBAC

ALB vs IBAC: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and IB Acquisition Corp. (IBAC) carry a correlation of -0.18, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.18
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.20
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-19.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ALB and IBAC?

On 3 years of weekly data the ALB/IBAC correlation comes out at -0.18, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.20) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -19.9 %².

IBAC is close to the least connected end of ALB's tracked universe, ranking #32 of 36. The last year tells two different stories: ALB led by 53.6 percentage points, +56.9% for ALB against +3.3% for IBAC. One caveat on sizing: ALB is 25.9 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ALB vs IBAC: side by side

ALB (Albemarle Corporation)IBAC (IB Acquisition Corp.)
1-year return+56.9%+3.3%
5-year return-39.2%n/a
Volatility (ann.)54.3%2.1%
Beta vs S&P 5001.62-0.00
Max drawdown (3Y)-74.1%-3.2%
Market cap$16.0B$0.1B
P/E (trailing)502.9
Dividend yield1.20%0.00%
Sector / categoryMaterialsUS Listed
Higher yield: ALB 1.20% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: IBAC -3.2% vs -74.1%
-6%0%+152%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. ALB · IBAC

Year-by-year returns

YearALBIBAC
2022-6.6%
2023-32.8%
2024-39.5%
2025+67.7%+3.7%
2026-3.5%+3.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ALB and IBAC good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.18, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ALB and IBAC?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between ALB and IBAC is -0.18 over 3 years, -0.20 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.

Is IBAC a good diversifier for ALB?

Yes: at -0.18, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.18 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.18 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/alb-vs-ibac.json

ALB vs IBAC: 3-year weekly correlation -0.18ALB vs IBAC-0.18

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![ALB vs IBAC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/alb-vs-ibac.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/alb-vs-ibac/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ALB correlations · IBAC correlations