PairBook
HomeALB › ALB vs GGZ

ALB vs GGZ: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Gabelli Global Small and Mid Cap Value Trust (The) (GGZ) carry a correlation of 0.50, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.50
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.49
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.52
long-run
Ann. covariance
479.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ALB and GGZ?

On 3 years of weekly data the ALB/GGZ correlation comes out at 0.50, moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.49 over 1 year against 0.50 over 3. The 5-year figure is 0.52, and annualized covariance runs at 479.4 %².

By 3-year correlation, GGZ places #13 of the 36 assets tracked against ALB. The last year tells two different stories: ALB led by 35.7 percentage points, +56.9% for ALB against +21.2% for GGZ. One caveat on sizing: ALB is 3.1 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ALB vs GGZ: side by side

ALB (Albemarle Corporation)GGZ (Gabelli Global Small and Mid Cap Value Trust (The))
1-year return+56.9%+21.2%
5-year return-39.2%+37.8%
Volatility (ann.)54.3%17.8%
Beta vs S&P 5001.620.90
Max drawdown (3Y)-74.1%-17.8%
Market cap$16.0B
P/E (trailing)502.95.6
Dividend yield1.20%0.00%
Sector / categoryMaterialsUS Listed
Lower P/E: GGZ 5.6 vs 502.9Higher yield: ALB 1.20% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: GGZ -17.8% vs -74.1%Higher 5y return: GGZ +37.8% vs -39.2%
-6%0%+152%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. ALB · GGZ

Year-by-year returns

YearALBGGZ
2022-6.6%-25.5%
2023-32.8%+10.7%
2024-39.5%+5.2%
2025+67.7%+34.9%
2026-3.5%+13.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ALB and GGZ good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.50 means ALB and GGZ share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ALB and GGZ?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between ALB and GGZ is 0.50 over 3 years, 0.49 over 1 year and 0.52 over 5 years.

Is GGZ a good diversifier for ALB?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.50 means ALB and GGZ share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.50 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/alb-vs-ggz.json

ALB vs GGZ: 3-year weekly correlation 0.50ALB vs GGZ0.50

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![ALB vs GGZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/alb-vs-ggz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/alb-vs-ggz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ALB correlations · GGZ correlations