PairBook
HomeALB › ALB vs BNC

ALB vs BNC: Correlation

How closely do Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and CEA Industries Inc. (BNC) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.16, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.16
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.12
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.07
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1016.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ALB and BNC?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of ALB and BNC correlate at -0.16, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.12) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.07, with an annualized covariance of -1016.4 %².

By 3-year correlation, BNC places #31 of the 36 assets tracked against ALB. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with ALB ahead by 143.0 points (+56.9% versus -86.1%). One caveat on sizing: BNC is 2.2 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ALB vs BNC: side by side

ALB (Albemarle Corporation)BNC (CEA Industries Inc.)
1-year return+56.9%-86.1%
5-year return-39.2%-97.4%
Volatility (ann.)54.3%120.4%
Beta vs S&P 5001.62-0.47
Max drawdown (3Y)-74.1%-96.5%
Market cap$16.0B$0.1B
P/E (trailing)502.90.0
Dividend yield1.20%0.00%
Sector / categoryMaterialsUS Listed
Lower P/E: BNC 0.0 vs 502.9Higher yield: ALB 1.20% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: ALB -74.1% vs -96.5%Higher 5y return: ALB -39.2% vs -97.4%
-90%0%+152%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. ALB · BNC

Year-by-year returns

YearALBBNC
2022-6.6%-82.5%
2023-32.8%-34.9%
2024-39.5%+23.7%
2025+67.7%-20.9%
2026-3.5%-53.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ALB and BNC good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.16, ALB and BNC have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ALB and BNC?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.16 over 3 years, with -0.12 over the last year and -0.07 over 5 years.

Is BNC a good diversifier for ALB?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.16, ALB and BNC have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.16 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.16 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/alb-vs-bnc.json

ALB vs BNC: 3-year weekly correlation -0.16ALB vs BNC-0.16

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![ALB vs BNC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/alb-vs-bnc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/alb-vs-bnc/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ALB correlations · BNC correlations