PairBook
HomeALAB › ALAB vs CLS

ALAB vs CLS: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) and Celestica, Inc. (CLS) carry a correlation of 0.54, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.54
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.47
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
2894.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ALAB and CLS?

Over the past 3 years, ALAB and CLS moved with a correlation of 0.54, which is moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.47 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 2894.4 %².

Among the 18 assets we track against ALAB, CLS ranks #5 by 3-year correlation. Over the last 12 months ALAB came out ahead by 12.7 percentage points (+69.7% against +57.0%).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ALAB vs CLS: side by side

ALAB (Astera Labs, Inc.)CLS (Celestica, Inc.)
1-year return+69.7%+57.0%
5-year returnn/a+3251.4%
Volatility (ann.)84.6%60.6%
Beta vs S&P 5002.902.49
Max drawdown (3Y)-63.7%-54.0%
Market cap$52.8B$40.0B
P/E (trailing)142.832.0
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: CLS 32.0 vs 142.8Smaller drawdown: CLS -54.0% vs -63.7%
-41%0%+118%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). ALAB · CLS

Year-by-year returns

YearALABCLS
2022+1.3%
2023+159.8%
2024+215.2%
2025+25.6%+220.3%
2026+82.8%+7.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ALAB and CLS good diversifiers for each other?

Somewhat, no more. With 0.54 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ALAB and CLS?

The ALAB/CLS correlation stands at 0.54 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.47, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is CLS a good diversifier for ALAB?

Somewhat, no more. With 0.54 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.

What does a correlation of 0.54 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.54 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/alab-vs-cls.json

ALAB vs CLS: 3-year weekly correlation 0.54ALAB vs CLS0.54

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![ALAB vs CLS correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/alab-vs-cls.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/alab-vs-cls/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ALAB correlations · CLS correlations